Services

Consulting, and only consulting.

Every engagement below is advisory. Innovide sells no software, resells nothing, and takes no referral fees, which means the recommendation you get is the one we would act on ourselves.

Practice

Security & Risk

Leadership when a security program needs an owner, construction when there is nothing yet to own, and the exercises that reveal whether any of it survives contact with a real incident.

Virtual & Fractional CISO

Executive security leadership, without the executive headcount.

Most organizations reach a point where security needs an owner with judgment and authority — but not a full-time salary. Innovide serves as your accountable security executive: setting strategy, holding the risk register, briefing the board and audit committee, and giving your engineering and business leaders one place to take a hard question.

This is a relationship, not a report. We learn your business, your constraints, and your genuine appetite for risk, then run the program against them.

Typical shape Retainer, typically one to four days per month

What you get

  • Security strategy and a sequenced, costed roadmap
  • Board and audit-committee reporting pack
  • Maintained risk register with treatment plans and owners
  • Policy and standards set your people will actually follow
  • Budget, tooling, and headcount recommendations
  • Customer and regulator security-question support
Discuss this

Security Governance & Program Design

The scaffolding that turns scattered security activity into a program.

Framework selection and honest alignment — NIST CSF 2.0, ISO/IEC 27001, CIS Controls — rather than a spreadsheet of green cells that nobody believes. Control ownership that maps to real people, metrics that would actually change a decision, and a governance cadence that survives contact with a busy quarter.

Typical shape Fixed scope, six to twelve weeks typical

What you get

  • Framework selection and current-state alignment assessment
  • Policy architecture and a right-sized document set
  • RACI for control ownership across the organization
  • Security metrics and reporting cadence
  • Committee and governance-forum design with terms of reference
Discuss this

Risk & Third-Party Risk

Know what could actually hurt you, and which of it you have outsourced.

Enterprise and targeted risk assessments written in language an executive can act on. Third-party risk work covering the vendors that matter, in proportion to what they can do to you — not a questionnaire sent to all of them equally.

Typical shape Fixed scope

What you get

  • Enterprise or scoped risk assessment with prioritized findings
  • Third-party risk program design and tiering model
  • Vendor due-diligence review and concentration-risk analysis
  • Security due diligence for acquisitions and investments
Discuss this

Tabletop Exercises & Crisis Simulation

Find out how your people decide under pressure while it is still a rehearsal.

Facilitated exercises built on your actual threat model and your actual dependencies — not a generic ransomware script. Innovide runs them for technical responders, for executive teams, and for boards, at the altitude each audience needs.

Every exercise ends with a hotwash and a findings report where each item has an owner and a date. An exercise that produces only good feelings has not done its job.

Typical shape Fixed scope. Half-day to two-day session, on site or remote

What you get

  • Scenario design tied to your environment, sector, and threat model
  • Facilitation with timed injects and escalating pressure
  • Structured hotwash immediately following
  • Findings report with prioritized actions, owners, and dates
  • Exercise program design for organizations running these regularly
Discuss this

Incident Response Readiness

Decide who decides — before the call comes in at 2am.

Most incident damage traces back to unclear authority and slow decisions rather than to the technical event itself. Innovide builds the plan, the playbooks, and the escalation map, and makes sure the legal, communications, and executive paths are established before you need them.

We build response structure on NIMS ICS — the incident command system US emergency services and federal agencies run on. It is uncommon in cyber, where most programs adopt a lifecycle model that describes the phases of an incident but never establishes who is in charge of one. ICS supplies exactly that missing half: a single incident commander, defined operational periods, explicit span of control, and common terminology that holds up when the room fills with people who have never worked together.

If a breach is already underway, that work is covered under Breach Response & Recovery rather than here.

Typical shape Fixed scope

What you get

  • Incident response plan and scenario playbooks
  • Incident command structure on NIMS ICS, with named roles and activation thresholds
  • Roles, authority thresholds, and escalation mapping
  • Forensics, breach counsel, and IR-retainer vendor selection support
  • Cyber insurance policy review against your actual response plan
  • Communications and legal coordination design
  • Post-incident review and remediation tracking
Discuss this

Breach Response & Recovery Advisory

Someone has to run the response. That is a role, not a checklist.

The hour a breach is confirmed, your organization acquires a crowd: digital forensics, outside breach counsel, the cyber insurer and whichever panel vendors it requires, possibly law enforcement and a regulator with its own clock, your executives, your board, and your own engineers who have not slept. Every one of them has a different mandate, a different reporting line, and a different definition of urgent. Almost nobody owns the whole picture.

Innovide takes that role. We quarterback the response: holding the operational picture, driving decisions to closure, keeping the specialists pointed in the same direction, and translating between the technical floor and the boardroom. Counsel still directs strategy and privilege. Forensics still does forensics. What we supply is the command function that ties them together, which is usually the piece nobody bought in advance.

Operations run on NIMS ICS. That gives the response a single incident commander, defined operational periods with real handoffs, incident action plans, and a situation-reporting rhythm — so the third day is not run on the same adrenaline and guesswork as the first. It also means that when law enforcement or emergency management joins, they recognize the structure immediately, because it is the one they already use.

Recovery is treated as its own phase rather than as whatever happens after containment. Restoration gets sequenced by business impact, decisions get documented while they are still fresh, and the organization comes out of it with something more useful than relief.

To be unambiguous about scope: this is advisory and command. Innovide does not perform forensic acquisition or analysis, does not negotiate with threat actors, and does not provide legal advice. We help you select those specialists, then direct and coordinate them — which is a different job, and the one that is usually missing.

Typical shape On-call when it is already happening; retainer for standing coverage

What you get

  • Incident command: one accountable owner for the response
  • Coordination across forensics, breach counsel, cyber insurance and its panel vendors, law enforcement, and regulators
  • Operational battle rhythm — operational periods, incident action plans, and situation reports
  • Executive and board briefings that turn technical status into decisions
  • Documentation discipline that supports the insurance claim and works within the privilege structure your counsel sets
  • Recovery sequencing and restoration prioritized by business impact
  • Post-incident review, and a remediation plan with owners and dates
Discuss this

Cyber Resilience & Continuity

Prevention will eventually fail. Plan for the day it does.

Resilience work starts from a different question than security work: not "how do we stop this?" but "what must keep running, and for how long can it not?" That reframing tends to surface dependencies and concentration risks that control-focused assessments miss entirely.

Typical shape Fixed scope

What you get

  • Critical service mapping and impact tolerance definition
  • Dependency and concentration-risk analysis
  • Recovery objectives validated against tested capability, not assumption
  • Backup and restore assurance review
  • Continuity and recovery plan development
Discuss this

Compliance Readiness

Get ready for the audit. We are not the auditor.

Gap assessment and readiness support for SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, CMMC, and the customer security questionnaires that increasingly gate your deals. Purely advisory — Innovide does not perform audits or issue attestations, so there is no independence conflict and no incentive to find work for a testing arm.

Typical shape Fixed scope

What you get

  • Readiness gap assessment against your target framework
  • Remediation plan sequenced by effort and audit impact
  • Evidence and control-narrative preparation
  • Auditor selection support and liaison
  • Customer security questionnaire and RFP response support
Discuss this

Practice

Technology & AI

Leadership when technology has outgrown ad-hoc ownership, structure when AI needs to move from pilot to production, and independent judgment on the platform decisions that are cheap to make and costly to unmake.

AI Governance & Assurance

Control over how AI is built, bought, and used — before someone else forces the issue.

AI is entering most organizations from three directions at once: vendors switching it on inside products you already own, teams building with it, and staff using it whether or not anyone approved it. Governance that arrives after an incident, a customer questionnaire, or a regulator is governance built under pressure.

Innovide establishes the inventory, the decision rights, and the guardrails — sized so that teams can keep shipping. The goal is not to slow AI adoption. It is to make adoption defensible.

Typical shape Fixed scope, or a workstream inside a vCISO retainer

Read the full AI governance engagement

What you get

  • Inventory of AI systems in use, including shadow and embedded-vendor AI
  • Risk classification scheme and intake / review process
  • Acceptable-use policy and development standards
  • Model and vendor due-diligence criteria
  • Human oversight, escalation, and incident paths for AI failures
  • Evaluation and monitoring expectations, with named owners
  • Alignment to NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001, with EU AI Act duties flagged where they apply
Discuss this

Virtual & Fractional CIO

Technology leadership for organizations that have outgrown ad-hoc IT.

At a certain size, technology stops being something the operations manager handles between other duties and starts being a function that needs an owner. Innovide provides that leadership on a fractional basis: setting the roadmap, owning the IT budget, managing the vendor portfolio, and translating between what the business wants and what the systems can actually support.

Much of the value is unglamorous — licensing that has quietly doubled, a backup nobody has restored from, four tools doing one job, a renewal signed because nobody had time to look. Getting those right compounds faster than any transformation initiative.

Typical shape Retainer, typically one to four days per month

What you get

  • Technology roadmap tied to business objectives
  • IT budget construction and cost rationalization
  • Vendor portfolio review, consolidation, and renewal strategy
  • Application and systems inventory with lifecycle planning
  • IT operating model, staffing, and sourcing recommendations
  • Executive and board technology reporting
Discuss this

AI Enablement & Adoption

Get past the pilot. Turn AI experiments into work that actually ships.

Most organizations are not short of AI ideas. They are short of a way to decide which ones are worth building, who owns them, and how anyone would know whether they worked. The result is a graveyard of promising pilots and a leadership team that cannot say what any of it returned.

Innovide brings structure to that: finding the use cases where AI genuinely beats the alternative, sequencing them by value and feasibility, getting the data and the people ready, and agreeing what success looks like before the build starts. Governance runs alongside the work rather than arriving afterward to argue with it.

Typical shape Fixed scope, or an ongoing advisory retainer

What you get

  • Use-case discovery, scoring, and a prioritized portfolio
  • Feasibility and build-versus-buy assessment per use case
  • Data readiness review for the selected use cases
  • Pilot design with success criteria agreed in advance
  • Adoption, training, and change-management plan
  • Value measurement framework and executive reporting
Discuss this

Data Strategy & Governance

AI is only as good as the data underneath it. That is usually the real problem.

Most stalled AI and analytics work traces back to data rather than to models: nobody agrees what a customer record is, quality is unmeasured, ownership is unassigned, and a meaningful share of it cannot lawfully be used for the purpose being proposed.

Innovide establishes what data exists, who owns it, what condition it is in, and what it may be used for — then sequences the work to make it fit for the uses you actually have planned, rather than for an abstract ideal state.

Typical shape Fixed scope

What you get

  • Data inventory, domain mapping, and ownership assignment
  • Data quality assessment against intended uses
  • Classification, retention, and lifecycle standards
  • Data governance operating model and stewardship roles
  • Privacy and permitted-use analysis for AI and analytics
  • Prioritized remediation roadmap
Discuss this

Technology Strategy & Architecture

The architecture and platform decisions that are expensive to reverse.

Architecture and design review, identity and zero-trust strategy, cloud posture and cost, build-versus-buy analysis, and modernization sequencing. The decisions in this category tend to be cheap to make and expensive to unmake, which is exactly when an outside read is worth having.

Innovide holds no partner tiers and resells nothing, so a platform recommendation carries no margin and "you already own something that does this" is an answer we are free to give.

Typical shape Fixed scope, or advisory retainer

What you get

  • Architecture and design review with prioritized findings
  • Identity, access, and zero-trust strategy
  • Cloud architecture, posture, and cost review
  • Build-versus-buy and platform selection analysis
  • Modernization roadmap and sequencing
  • Technical standards and reference architectures
Discuss this

Technology Due Diligence

An independent read on what you are actually buying.

For investors, acquirers, and boards: an assessment of a target's technology and security posture written for the people making the decision rather than for engineers. What is genuinely solid, what is deferred maintenance, what will need capital inside eighteen months, and which findings are real deal risks as opposed to the normal imperfections every company has.

Innovide has no relationship with the target and nothing to sell either side of the transaction, which is the only position from which this assessment is worth reading.

Typical shape Fixed scope, typically two to four weeks

What you get

  • Architecture, scalability, and technical debt assessment
  • Security and compliance posture review
  • Engineering practice, team capability, and key-person risk
  • Third-party, licensing, and concentration exposure
  • Post-close remediation plan with indicative costs
  • Findings memo written for an investment committee
Discuss this

Engagement models

Three ways to buy the work. Two are priced before anything starts. The third is for when there is no time for that.

Monthly or annual

Retainer

A standing commitment of time, contracted on a monthly or an annual term. Best for virtual CISO and CIO work, for incident response retainers, and for anyone who wants continuity rather than a document drop. Annual terms suit organizations that want the planning horizon; monthly suits those testing the fit first.

Priced up front

Fixed scope

A defined piece of work — an assessment, a program build, a tabletop, a governance workshop, an executive briefing — with deliverables, timeline, and price agreed in writing before anything starts. No hourly meter running.

Time and materials

On-call advisory

For organizations that need help now and have no retainer in place. A suspected breach, a customer escalation, a regulator asking questions, a decision that cannot wait for a proposal cycle. No prior relationship required and nothing to sign in advance — billed against the hours you actually use, and we will say early if what you need is a forensics firm rather than an advisor.

Start with a conversation.

No charge, no obligation, and no pitch deck. Tell us what is putting pressure on you and we will tell you honestly whether we can help.

Get in touch